<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Daily and Weekly View of Goldman Sachs GS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163469</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163469</guid>
		<description>Dacian,

I&#039;ll try to follow up in the future with a chart but wherever large 4 ends - perhaps around SP 1,000 or 1,100 or so, then we&#039;ll do projections from there.  Right now - for my level of expertise - it&#039;s too early to start projecting fractals of the 5th wave.

I&#039;d love to hear others&#039; suggestions though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dacian,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to follow up in the future with a chart but wherever large 4 ends &#8211; perhaps around SP 1,000 or 1,100 or so, then we&#8217;ll do projections from there.  Right now &#8211; for my level of expertise &#8211; it&#8217;s too early to start projecting fractals of the 5th wave.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear others&#8217; suggestions though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dacian</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163185</link>
		<dc:creator>dacian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163185</guid>
		<description>Corey, sorry being off topic; how do you calculate your target prices for 5.1, 5.3, 5.5 sub-waves down for SPX, if that is coming? thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey, sorry being off topic; how do you calculate your target prices for 5.1, 5.3, 5.5 sub-waves down for SPX, if that is coming? thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toad37</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163150</link>
		<dc:creator>toad37</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163150</guid>
		<description>Corey,
I have tights stop and will be comfortable playing their inverse twin ETFs if we go below my tight stops. Thanks for pointing this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,<br />
I have tights stop and will be comfortable playing their inverse twin ETFs if we go below my tight stops. Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163111</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163111</guid>
		<description>Toad,

Both funds are testing critical support levels.  I&#039;m a more conservative trader and I want to see if these levels hold.

Whatever happens, there should be a nice impulse move up or down off these critical levels here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toad,</p>
<p>Both funds are testing critical support levels.  I&#8217;m a more conservative trader and I want to see if these levels hold.</p>
<p>Whatever happens, there should be a nice impulse move up or down off these critical levels here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163109</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163109</guid>
		<description>Reggie,

True - today&#039;s action notwithstanding.  That volume divergence persists it seems.

There&#039;s EMA support beneath both the S&amp;P and GS (and CAT) and it would be majorly significant if they all broke support.  Thursday &amp; Friday will be critical.

If we fail here, it will confirm a nasty bull trap and we should expect a possible swift down-move soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reggie,</p>
<p>True &#8211; today&#8217;s action notwithstanding.  That volume divergence persists it seems.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s EMA support beneath both the S&#038;P and GS (and CAT) and it would be majorly significant if they all broke support.  Thursday &#038; Friday will be critical.</p>
<p>If we fail here, it will confirm a nasty bull trap and we should expect a possible swift down-move soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toad37</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163104</link>
		<dc:creator>toad37</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163104</guid>
		<description>Bought some USO and SSO on this pullback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought some USO and SSO on this pullback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Perrin</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163102</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163102</guid>
		<description>as mentioned risk/reward is probably to the downside with the break of 80.

As always it is the false break that has the most impact. G Sachs (like the SP500) has had a low volume early Jan break out to the upside ........ failure opens up significant downside potential

As I write the SP500 is testing its Jan 2009 opening level of 902/903. Just having a look !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as mentioned risk/reward is probably to the downside with the break of 80.</p>
<p>As always it is the false break that has the most impact. G Sachs (like the SP500) has had a low volume early Jan break out to the upside &#8230;&#8230;.. failure opens up significant downside potential</p>
<p>As I write the SP500 is testing its Jan 2009 opening level of 902/903. Just having a look !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163098</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163098</guid>
		<description>Dominick,

Often the higher timeframe dictates the action thanks to the bigger players seeing the strength as a chance to &#039;get short again&#039; which is often the case.  It takes a great deal of force to reverse a trend so it is assumed to be dominant until officially reversed.

When you have conflicting signals, you would take a reduced position - if any at all.  Might want to move on to another stock(s) until the pattern resolves and price breaks one way or the other.

It would just tell you to be cautious and not get aggressive... and to always check the higher time frame before getting excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dominick,</p>
<p>Often the higher timeframe dictates the action thanks to the bigger players seeing the strength as a chance to &#8216;get short again&#8217; which is often the case.  It takes a great deal of force to reverse a trend so it is assumed to be dominant until officially reversed.</p>
<p>When you have conflicting signals, you would take a reduced position &#8211; if any at all.  Might want to move on to another stock(s) until the pattern resolves and price breaks one way or the other.</p>
<p>It would just tell you to be cautious and not get aggressive&#8230; and to always check the higher time frame before getting excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163092</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163092</guid>
		<description>Corey I just read the Cat post and I think I have my answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey I just read the Cat post and I think I have my answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/a-daily-and-weekly-view-of-goldman-sachs-gs/comment-page-1/#comment-163089</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3522#comment-163089</guid>
		<description>Hello Corey. When you have a contradiction between the daily and weekly chart patterns, which timeframe is more likey to rule?  Short term or long? How would it affect a trading strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Corey. When you have a contradiction between the daily and weekly chart patterns, which timeframe is more likey to rule?  Short term or long? How would it affect a trading strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

