|

A Lesson Inside the Failed Bear Flag Feb 5

It’s true that failed trades sometimes can teach us more than successful trades, especially if we take the time to learn what went wrong – as in “Did I make a trading error” or “Did the market do something unexpected?”

There was a particularly high probability trade set-up that triggered late Friday afternoon that failed due to the afternoon surge, but there were a few hints and lessons we can learn from this experience, so let’s take a look!

First, we’ll start with the @ES (SP-mini futures) contract 5-min chart:

This is a simplified chart of the @ES with the 3/10 Oscillator and NYSE TICK as lower panel indicators.

The main idea of this trade set-up is a type of Bear Flag intraday where the goal is to get short on a move into overhead resistance (such as the 20 EMA) and trigger entry when a reversal candle forms (like the doji that peaked at 1,048 at 1:30 CST).

This retracement rally came after a new momentum (3/10) and TICK intraday low, both of which forecast lower prices are expected due to the increase in downside momentum and selling pressure.

For reference, this trade set-up was similar in structure to the 11:30am ‘bear flag’ rally into the declining 20 period EMA that also formed a doji reversal candle at resistance after a flag-like retracement to the 1,056 level.

Aggressive trade entries are taken at the upper resistance line while conservative entries are taken – with confirmation – when price breaks under the lower trendline.

As such, at 1:30, a short-sell is triggered with an entry as close to 1,048 as possible while placing a stop one to two points (depending on your strategy) higher than your entry.

The minimum target was a retest of the intraday low at 1,040 or – preferably – a new swing low that would end under 1,040.

So we enter the trade and wait…10 minutes later, we are already in the profit zone by 3 points ($50 per contract)… but something unexpected happened!

Price rallied slightly higher, paused, and then took off suddenly and stopped us out with a small loss.

Of course, I want to know if there was any way I could have foreseen this trade failure, or any lessons to be learned.

It turns out, there were!

Let’s see the 1-min chart and learn a valuable lesson about bias, neutrality, and reading market internals.

The Red “S” and arrow at 1:40 represent an ideal entry when the 1-min trendline was broken after the 5-min ‘doji’ formed (reference both charts).

We also saw a slight negative TICK divergence leading into the 1,048 high – that’s often only seen on the 1-min frame.

So as price rallied off the 1,044 level, it was no big deal because our stop was safe at 1,049/1,050 (depending if you prefer tight stops or not… remember we are playing for at least an 8 point target to the downside).

At 2:02 CST, something powerful and interesting happened that was either ignored by traders with a “The Market HAS to Go Down” bias or not seen by those not watching internals closely.

Price formed a New TICK high on the session which corresponded with a 20,000 print in @ES Volume – interesting.

These are “Hidden” Signs of Strength (new TICK highs when price is far from making an intraday TICK high) which forecasts reversals and bullish strength yet to come.

I have little green dots on my TICK charts to clue me in when we are making new intraday TICK highs – that’s very important to know.

Why?

Because we can’t let our bias (that “This trade HAS to work!”) cloud the reality of the growing bullish/buying power coming into the market.

Exactly 5 minutes after this “Shot Across the Bow” (which should have triggered you out with a stop-loss), price surged in an impressive power buying (short-squeeze/covering) rally.

This was forecast in part by the New TICK high and failed high-probability Bear Flag set-up.

Very aggressive traders could have flipped their position long and bought, taking advantage of the buying power and short-covering rally… but that’s another story.

Here are a few helpful lessons we can learn from this failed set-up:

1. Remain Flexible – do not let your bias (“The Market MUST Go Down”) cloud the reality of what’s happening

2. Seek High Probability, Low Risk Set-ups
(In this case, we had the trend, resistance, and a doji working in our favor, and were risking 2 points to play for 8 points)

3. Take Your Stop-Loss when the Trade Fails
(You would have been in a worse situation if you stubbornly held short into the sudden 10-point rally)
(In fact, some of the largest swings occur AFTER a high-probability set-ups has failed … I call this “Popped Stops”)

4.  “Anything Can Happen” in the Market (Mark Douglas)
Even the best set-ups can … and sometimes do… fail and that’s perfectly fine as long as you control risk.
Don’t blame JP Morgan’s Buy Desk or Goldman Sachs – trading is a game of probabilities instead of certainties.

Study each day to learn more concepts and do your own end-of-day analysis of the charts to make yourselves even better traders!

Corey Rosenbloom, CMT
Afraid to Trade.com

Follow Corey on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/afraidtotrade

Similar Posts

10 Comments

  1. I was looking at yesterday's chart of SPY and inverse (2X) SPY and FAZ. I think it is possible to count a 5-wave pattern on the impulse up. It is clearer in reverse on the inverse, especially FAZ, which has a clear double top on the one and 3-minute charts.

  2. Corey,

    I enjoy your work. It is always insightful. I've had you on my blogroll for some time. Addition to your blogroll would be much appreciated.

    Craig

  3. Cory, great post. One thing I'd like to point out in this failed trade is the 3/10 oscillator. It did not give a sell signal. In fact, it gave a buy signal at 11:50 (PT). If you were to take the aggressive entry that you mentioned, this would have signaled a failed break down from the bear flag and opportunity to exit with a scratch. The conservative entry you mention, in fact, never set up due to the 3/10 oscillator.

    For comparison, the 3/10 gave a sell signal at 9:45 (PT).

  4. Corey, this is really a good post, congrats. Instead of observing the market closely and looking at the facts, some people prefer to accuse dark forces.

  5. Very Interesting Corey!
    I don't like the 1,5 and 10 minute charts, it's all a little too much too fast. I prefer finding a trend on daily and an entry point on a 4 hour chart. Sometimes it means a position needs to be held for a few weeks, other times a day or two.

    I find that the patterns on smaller time frames are more often mis-leading than on the larger ones?

  6. Very Interesting Corey!
    I don't like the 1,5 and 10 minute charts, it's all a little too much too fast. I prefer finding a trend on daily and an entry point on a 4 hour chart. Sometimes it means a position needs to be held for a few weeks, other times a day or two.

    I find that the patterns on smaller time frames are more often mis-leading than on the larger ones?

Comments are closed.