<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andrews Pitchfork on the US Dollar Index Oct 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Quick Look at the Daily Euro Chart Feb 17 &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-212195</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quick Look at the Daily Euro Chart Feb 17 &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-212195</guid>
		<description>[...] October 19: &#8220;Andrews Pitchfork Update on the US Dollar Index&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 19: &#8220;Andrews Pitchfork Update on the US Dollar Index&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan de Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-213210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan de Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-213210</guid>
		<description>Got a buy signal on the 3 10 16 MACD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a buy signal on the 3 10 16 MACD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan de Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-210787</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan de Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-210787</guid>
		<description>Got a buy signal on the 3 10 16 MACD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a buy signal on the 3 10 16 MACD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-210782</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-210782</guid>
		<description>Hey Reader,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried different combination, none of which made any sense (the fork would be too high or too low) so those configurations - as you mentioned - gave no helpful insights into the trend or price structure by using the Pitchfork in a classical/standard manner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s often through &#039;unique&#039; uses or non-conventional uses that you get better results, as shown above (this is a Constance Brown style logic).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re free to select the points as needed for the Pitchfork - you aren&#039;t locked into standard price highs or lows, particularly if they don&#039;t make sense.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes it&#039;s trial and error, and sometimes the tool won&#039;t work at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your main goal is to see structure, and confine the price in a logical method as best as you can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If need be, just think of these simply as trendlines instead of a specialized tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Reader,</p>
<p>I tried different combination, none of which made any sense (the fork would be too high or too low) so those configurations &#8211; as you mentioned &#8211; gave no helpful insights into the trend or price structure by using the Pitchfork in a classical/standard manner.</p>
<p>It&#39;s often through &#39;unique&#39; uses or non-conventional uses that you get better results, as shown above (this is a Constance Brown style logic).  </p>
<p>You&#39;re free to select the points as needed for the Pitchfork &#8211; you aren&#39;t locked into standard price highs or lows, particularly if they don&#39;t make sense.  </p>
<p>Sometimes it&#39;s trial and error, and sometimes the tool won&#39;t work at all.</p>
<p>Your main goal is to see structure, and confine the price in a logical method as best as you can.</p>
<p>If need be, just think of these simply as trendlines instead of a specialized tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-210781</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-210781</guid>
		<description>Hey Chomen,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right - I didn&#039;t include the larger fractals, but I did highlight the 5-wave fractal move down in the Elliott Post update I linked to. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Totally agreed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chomen,</p>
<p>Right &#8211; I didn&#39;t include the larger fractals, but I did highlight the 5-wave fractal move down in the Elliott Post update I linked to. </p>
<p>Totally agreed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-210780</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-210780</guid>
		<description>Hi&lt;br&gt;a few questions...&lt;br&gt;I recognize how your chart neatly shows the trend within the 38.2% area of the fork. &lt;br&gt;However, if the &#039;handle&#039; of the fork started in 11/08, then why did you by-pass the low of 12/08, and the high of 3/09, for marking your fork tines? This &#039;first&#039; set of high and low would not have revealed your trend collection of candles. &lt;br&gt;Likewise if you had selected the 3/09 high as the start of your fork handle, and used your high and low, it would not have revealed your collection of trend in candles.&lt;br&gt;It seems you have the liberty to select which ever point you desire to start your fork, with any set of high and low you choose; and not necessarily the &#039;next&#039; set of high and low points. Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />a few questions&#8230;<br />I recognize how your chart neatly shows the trend within the 38.2% area of the fork. <br />However, if the &#39;handle&#39; of the fork started in 11/08, then why did you by-pass the low of 12/08, and the high of 3/09, for marking your fork tines? This &#39;first&#39; set of high and low would not have revealed your trend collection of candles. <br />Likewise if you had selected the 3/09 high as the start of your fork handle, and used your high and low, it would not have revealed your collection of trend in candles.<br />It seems you have the liberty to select which ever point you desire to start your fork, with any set of high and low you choose; and not necessarily the &#39;next&#39; set of high and low points. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chomen</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/andrews-pitchfork-on-the-us-dollar-index-oct-18/comment-page-1/#comment-210773</link>
		<dc:creator>chomen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4786#comment-210773</guid>
		<description>E-wave looks like 5 down in the C leg, if you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-wave looks like 5 down in the C leg, if you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
