<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confusion in the Market: How to Understand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brian!

There are so many advantages to purely technical or purely mechanical trading systems.  You have objective targets, entries, exits, and the mental confusion of the &quot;why&quot; is virtually absent.  Trying to predict the market is difficult if not impossible.  It really comes down to following a system - discretionary or mechanical (or combo) - with a positive edge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brian!</p>
<p>There are so many advantages to purely technical or purely mechanical trading systems.  You have objective targets, entries, exits, and the mental confusion of the &#8220;why&#8221; is virtually absent.  Trying to predict the market is difficult if not impossible.  It really comes down to following a system &#8211; discretionary or mechanical (or combo) &#8211; with a positive edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>Corey,

Very good post! As you know, I trade with systems, so I just let the computer tell me what to do. This helps quiet the noise, and let&#039;s me tune out all the stuff that I can make up in my head about what I think the market is going to do.

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,</p>
<p>Very good post! As you know, I trade with systems, so I just let the computer tell me what to do. This helps quiet the noise, and let&#8217;s me tune out all the stuff that I can make up in my head about what I think the market is going to do.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Thats why you just keep trading as usual.  Trade what you see, and the probabilities of your setups should remain static.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats why you just keep trading as usual.  Trade what you see, and the probabilities of your setups should remain static.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>Joe,

I have not conducted extensive optimization on the parameters for the input, but typically will use 3 months for short-term analysis of recent trends and 6-months for intermediate or larger flow.  The larger th time frame, the later the signals but the more significant the &#039;flow&#039;.

 Weekly chart analysts and position traders may do well with the one-year chart.  I&#039;m looking forward to your insights and results.
Thanks Joerg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>I have not conducted extensive optimization on the parameters for the input, but typically will use 3 months for short-term analysis of recent trends and 6-months for intermediate or larger flow.  The larger th time frame, the later the signals but the more significant the &#8216;flow&#8217;.</p>
<p> Weekly chart analysts and position traders may do well with the one-year chart.  I&#8217;m looking forward to your insights and results.<br />
Thanks Joerg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/confusion-in-the-market-how-to-understand/#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>Corey,

What is the best look back period to determine sector strength? - I know you proposed using 3 months when you described the methad with prohet.net. Have you ever conducted an optimization in this area? Is 3 months better or three weeks?
I&#039;ll probably be able to conduct an optimization tonight (and will post the results here), but would be very interested in your experience.

Sorry for hijacking this thread...

Thanks, Joerg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,</p>
<p>What is the best look back period to determine sector strength? &#8211; I know you proposed using 3 months when you described the methad with prohet.net. Have you ever conducted an optimization in this area? Is 3 months better or three weeks?<br />
I&#8217;ll probably be able to conduct an optimization tonight (and will post the results here), but would be very interested in your experience.</p>
<p>Sorry for hijacking this thread&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, Joerg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

