<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting Fibonacci Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: air jordan shoes</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-214298</link>
		<dc:creator>air jordan shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-214298</guid>
		<description>The post of content is very interesting and exciting. I learned a lot from here.The content from simple to complex, so all of you can come in . No matter you want to see what can be found.By the way ,there are some websites is also very wonderful,you can go and see.such as   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.discount-air-jordan.com/ajf-6.html&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ajf 6&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post of content is very interesting and exciting. I learned a lot from here.The content from simple to complex, so all of you can come in . No matter you want to see what can be found.By the way ,there are some websites is also very wonderful,you can go and see.such as   <a href="http://www.discount-air-jordan.com/ajf-6.html"  rel="nofollow">ajf 6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: air jordan 17</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-213877</link>
		<dc:creator>air jordan 17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-213877</guid>
		<description>It looks good,I have learn a recruit!&lt;br&gt;Recently,I found an excellent online store, the &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sall4.net&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sall4.net&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; are completely various, good quality and cheap price,it’s worth buying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks good,I have learn a recruit!<br />Recently,I found an excellent online store, the <br /><a href="http://sall4.net"  rel="nofollow">sall4.net</a> <br /> are completely various, good quality and cheap price,it’s worth buying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147546</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147546</guid>
		<description>Don,

You&#039;re right on your triangle targets.  Take the height, subtract from the base (at break-out point), achieve price projection target.  That&#039;s near 6,700.

Doing EWT projections, if we assume that this is a standard Elliott impulse, if Wave 3 was the longest/strongest (we assume it was), then Wave 5 will approximate Wave 1.  

Wave 1 was 14,200 to 11,600 which is an estimated distance of 2,600.

We then assume Wave 5 will be the same as Wave 1, so wherever Wave 4 terminates to the upside (let&#039;s say 10,000) then that gives us an EWT target of 7,400 which is relatively week (would be sort of a 5th wave truncation).

We can also assume that Wave 5 might be equal to 1.618 times wave 1 which would be 2,600 x 1.618 or 4,200.  If we assume Wave 4 truncates at 10,000 (another assumption) that would give a Wave 5 termination target of 5,800.  

These are rough estimations, though, and are based on the assumption Wave 4 ends around 10,000.

If it ended at 11,000, then the equality (Wave 1 = Wave 5) target would be 8,400 (a very weak Wave 5 target) or if 5 = 1.618 x Wave 1 would give us a more reasonable target of 6,800, which coincides with your 6,700 Fibonacci target.

Thus, 6,700 would be near a confluence target (confirmed by at least two price projection methods) which would tend to be more reasonable a target.

In terms of Elliott projections, it will depend on where Wave 4 ends to run the Wave 5 projections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right on your triangle targets.  Take the height, subtract from the base (at break-out point), achieve price projection target.  That&#8217;s near 6,700.</p>
<p>Doing EWT projections, if we assume that this is a standard Elliott impulse, if Wave 3 was the longest/strongest (we assume it was), then Wave 5 will approximate Wave 1.  </p>
<p>Wave 1 was 14,200 to 11,600 which is an estimated distance of 2,600.</p>
<p>We then assume Wave 5 will be the same as Wave 1, so wherever Wave 4 terminates to the upside (let&#8217;s say 10,000) then that gives us an EWT target of 7,400 which is relatively week (would be sort of a 5th wave truncation).</p>
<p>We can also assume that Wave 5 might be equal to 1.618 times wave 1 which would be 2,600 x 1.618 or 4,200.  If we assume Wave 4 truncates at 10,000 (another assumption) that would give a Wave 5 termination target of 5,800.  </p>
<p>These are rough estimations, though, and are based on the assumption Wave 4 ends around 10,000.</p>
<p>If it ended at 11,000, then the equality (Wave 1 = Wave 5) target would be 8,400 (a very weak Wave 5 target) or if 5 = 1.618 x Wave 1 would give us a more reasonable target of 6,800, which coincides with your 6,700 Fibonacci target.</p>
<p>Thus, 6,700 would be near a confluence target (confirmed by at least two price projection methods) which would tend to be more reasonable a target.</p>
<p>In terms of Elliott projections, it will depend on where Wave 4 ends to run the Wave 5 projections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Da Mon</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147530</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Da Mon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147530</guid>
		<description>Ok, I tried to reconcile the interpretation of the market club dow target of 6700-6800 on a descending triangle and the fibonacci retracement lines, Eliot Wave. If I draw the fib lines from around 14000 to 6700, I believe the lines match up quite nicely on closing values. My tool isn&#039;t precise, but here it appears that FIB and a desc triange both signal a lower dow target. Here is what I see.

14002 High
11214 Broke Support in Sept.
10353 Broke in early Oct.- not much support here
9491  Top of the range we&#039;ve been in for a while
8426 Support just broke, retesting. Where we are today, roughly
6702 Target down .. still ahead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I tried to reconcile the interpretation of the market club dow target of 6700-6800 on a descending triangle and the fibonacci retracement lines, Eliot Wave. If I draw the fib lines from around 14000 to 6700, I believe the lines match up quite nicely on closing values. My tool isn&#8217;t precise, but here it appears that FIB and a desc triange both signal a lower dow target. Here is what I see.</p>
<p>14002 High<br />
11214 Broke Support in Sept.<br />
10353 Broke in early Oct.- not much support here<br />
9491  Top of the range we&#8217;ve been in for a while<br />
8426 Support just broke, retesting. Where we are today, roughly<br />
6702 Target down .. still ahead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147504</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147504</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Precisely!  But keep in mind this is a free blog and I want to give you the tools to augment your own analysis, or cover certain developments you might be overlooking or that I find interesting.  I try to keep my opinions out of it as much as I can but I&#039;m finding overwhelming evidence - currently - that seems to point that we&#039;re experiencing at least a short-term to intermediate term bottom at the levels attained next week.  I&#039;ll work on TLT by this evening - thank you for that inspiration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Precisely!  But keep in mind this is a free blog and I want to give you the tools to augment your own analysis, or cover certain developments you might be overlooking or that I find interesting.  I try to keep my opinions out of it as much as I can but I&#8217;m finding overwhelming evidence &#8211; currently &#8211; that seems to point that we&#8217;re experiencing at least a short-term to intermediate term bottom at the levels attained next week.  I&#8217;ll work on TLT by this evening &#8211; thank you for that inspiration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147503</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147503</guid>
		<description>David,

Good call!  Fibonacci is one of those universal wonders perhaps, and the more we work with it, the better we&#039;ll be at interpreting it.  Thanks for the link!  Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Good call!  Fibonacci is one of those universal wonders perhaps, and the more we work with it, the better we&#8217;ll be at interpreting it.  Thanks for the link!  Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147502</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147502</guid>
		<description>PK,

I&#039;ll check that out and will likely do a post on it as well.  Thank you for that inspiration - I look forward to seeing that development.  Fibonacci analysis continues to amaze me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PK,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll check that out and will likely do a post on it as well.  Thank you for that inspiration &#8211; I look forward to seeing that development.  Fibonacci analysis continues to amaze me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147496</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147496</guid>
		<description>Dear Corey:

Is it not the implication of your Fibonacci post that we are at a long term if not intermediate term bottom? 

Would appreciate your interpretation of the chart of TLT for the last 4 months.  If we are topping there then is not the case for the stock market even stronger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Corey:</p>
<p>Is it not the implication of your Fibonacci post that we are at a long term if not intermediate term bottom? </p>
<p>Would appreciate your interpretation of the chart of TLT for the last 4 months.  If we are topping there then is not the case for the stock market even stronger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147300</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147300</guid>
		<description>Hey Corey ,

I have been playing around with extensions for the last few days and have blogged on it here 
http://stopsarein.com/2008/11/21/fib-numbers-pure-coincidence-lets-see/ and in a few other articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Corey ,</p>
<p>I have been playing around with extensions for the last few days and have blogged on it here<br />
<a href="http://stopsarein.com/2008/11/21/fib-numbers-pure-coincidence-lets-see/" rel="nofollow">http://stopsarein.com/2008/11/21/fib-numbers-pure-coincidence-lets-see/</a> and in a few other articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. K.</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/interesting-fibonacci-development/comment-page-1/#comment-147273</link>
		<dc:creator>P. K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3267#comment-147273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed similar &quot;amazing&quot; traits constructing fib levels myself.  If you have the capability, track the Dow from the Oct &#039;74 low to the 2007 peak.  The 50% line catches almost perfectly both the &#039;98 and 2002 lows.  And just happens to be about 40 Dow points below Friday&#039;s low.  What a wild coincidence!

I&#039;m using Telechart and I&#039;d like to know (even privately) whether your work reflects this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed similar &#8220;amazing&#8221; traits constructing fib levels myself.  If you have the capability, track the Dow from the Oct &#8216;74 low to the 2007 peak.  The 50% line catches almost perfectly both the &#8216;98 and 2002 lows.  And just happens to be about 40 Dow points below Friday&#8217;s low.  What a wild coincidence!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using Telechart and I&#8217;d like to know (even privately) whether your work reflects this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

