Over-Conservative Traders: Words from a Master

schabacker.pngIn his book Technical Analysis and Stock Market Profits, Richard Schabacker – also known as “The Father of Technical Analysis” – wrote parting comments to naturally conservative or risk averse investors that I wanted to share. Keep in mind, these words were written in the 1920s.

He states that most market students need words of restraint, rather than encouragement to action. Traders who are over-cautious are in the minority, but, as Schabacker states, “this class also makes the most consistent success in technical chart trading.”

“The student who has the innate character most favorable to profitable chart trading is … naturally conservative and skeptical… towards all chart rules, and will therefore fear to trade where others will rush in blindly and overconfidently to their ultimate loss.”

“Though those of careful and skeptical temperament are clearly in the minority, they are the successful majority.”

“Although the conservative student will err on that side of his nature, he may – for that reason – be more successful in the long run. However, he must guard against over-conservatism and excessive doubt and timidity. The chief stumbling block for this group is hesitation.”

In describing a typical pattern, the trader properly reasons the market and patterns clearly, then he weighs the opposite possibilities too carefully and decides to wait for confirmation. When the confirmation arises, the movement gets away from him and the more he procrastinates, the more hesitant he becomes, the more psychologically uncertain he becomes, and the less likely he is to profit from his correct initial analysis.

“The result of his procrastination is not only a possible psychological upset, but the tendency resolves itself either in frustration or rushing in without careful analysis and entering at the time the proper move which was forecast is now ending, or about to reverse itself.”

To the over-conservative trader, “his aim should be to give direct and prompt expression to the dictates of his study and analysis, once they have led him to a sound conclusion.”

Over-conservative traders will find comfort in stop-losses. “By using stop-loss orders as protection whenever he fears an upsetting of a conscientious analysis, he may venture definite action on his conviction, with the serenity that comes from knowing exactly how much it is possible to lose in case the market does indeed move unexpectedly in opposition to analytical conclusions.”

Finally, “Conservatism in moderate doses is a critical characteristic for market success, but conservatism may be carried to profitless extremes just as easy as radicalism. A healthy mingling of decisiveness and conservatism is the ideal mixture for the successful trader, as for most other careers as well.”

Indeed I still find comfort in those words and can show countless examples in my own life where I would study charts and news endlessly, decide on potential trade candidates, and when I would open my order entry screen, be scared away by pointless second-by-second ticks. Either the price would decline and I would pass altogether and pat myself on the back, or the market would move (or have gapped) in my favor and I would say “Well, I missed that one. It’s time to do more analysis for the next one.” When the “next one” came, I would engage in the same self-defeating head-games.

Stop losses are a comfort, and are essential, but if you place your stops too close to your entry (or too close to support/resistance), then natural market action will take you out for a frustrating loss and that cycle continues the fear cycle you are trying so hard to overcome. Then the next time, you will likely be more hesitant and might pass on the trade simply because of insignificant reasons you searched for to ease your mind.

Although you might find comfort in the quote “…conservative traders have the most success long term…” realize that you must guard against over-conservatism. A healthy dose of skepticism in market action is fine, yet when experienced in large doses, it keeps you frozen in the present with a trading account staying constantly stagnant. While traders certainly want to avoid their trading account heading to zero from overtrading, we also want to avoid an account staying bogged down from chronic undertrading.

(Quotes come from “Trading Tactics,” Chapter XII, – P. 417)

Similar Posts

6 Comments

  1. wonderful post Corey. Although I am personally on the other side of the spectrum (more radical than conservative) when it comes to trading, I understand where Schabacker is coming from. The reverse of this psychology can be applied to the aggressive trader, leading him towards conservatism to force better trades and executions. I will have to add this book to my long list of must reads.

  2. Truth to those words. One thing I saw is that conservative traders use smaller position sizing rather than betting big on one trade at a time. I found that overconfidence in the ability to predict the future price was almost always negative to the profit even if I was “generally” right. I was “correct” in the last September that we were bound to have a fall and bet beyond my limit. Then Fed came in and everyone was happy to ride up one more time so I painfully had to cover. Numerous times I realized that I was correct in the general direction but failed to profit or even lost big sum because either I couldn’t handle the pressure of jitter or I was too emotionally over-attached to the position to be profitable. By limiting the bet size I know I may lose but there is no blow-ups. But on the other hand when I am too conservative I realized I miss too many opportunities to slip by. It’s not good either. I think the lesson is so much harder than reading one or two books. Still learning and learning. Thanks for the great introduction of the book, Corey.

  3. Ainkurn,

    Thank you for the comment. It really is a great book, not just because of this passage I’ve chosen. It contains some of the original discussions of some of the classic technical patterns we take for granted today.

    Schabacker also had a section for risk-seeking and aggressive traders as well 🙂

  4. JSP,

    I was with you in that I spent the better part of 2007 calling for a market top and took some early stops just like you did shortly after February and then sort of lurked down at the intraday frames using pattern recognition because I could not understand why the market kept surging higher each and every month. I stopped fighting and then here we are, with the markets hit hard in 2008.

    Deep emotional attachment to trades, while it seems normal, is very harmful and it was something that gave me intense trouble early in my trading career.

    It really comes down to seeing and believing trading as a probability game only, believing that anything can happen (meaning use your stops and don’t overleverage), and taking trades that conform to your definition of a solid edge and letting the market play out and not trying to out-guess the market. It comes down to position sizing, risk management, and playing out your edge over as many occurrences as possible.

    It takes time no doubt. Thank you for the comment and I wish you the best.

Comments are closed.