<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible Elliott Wave Interpretation for the SP 500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-147058</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3230#comment-147058</guid>
		<description>Cory, my count is the same as yours. My chart shows the current wave 5 is an expanding diagonal, which started on Nov. 4 and possibly completed intrady today. If so wave (4) started today. Do you agree with my observation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory, my count is the same as yours. My chart shows the current wave 5 is an expanding diagonal, which started on Nov. 4 and possibly completed intrady today. If so wave (4) started today. Do you agree with my observation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-146391</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3230#comment-146391</guid>
		<description>Sorry I typed in a hurry and spelling was totally off.What I was trying to say is that we are still in Wave 4 and we havent felt the downside of wave five just yet. Once that plays out I think we correct to the upside. Im relatively new to EW but my dollar analysis is very similar. http://stopsarein.com/2008/11/16/euro-dollar-and-the-market/

Here is another EW take. The problem for me as a totally new person to EW is that its coming into my vision in the (i believe 4th wave ) which is very hard to count so im constantly looking for scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I typed in a hurry and spelling was totally off.What I was trying to say is that we are still in Wave 4 and we havent felt the downside of wave five just yet. Once that plays out I think we correct to the upside. Im relatively new to EW but my dollar analysis is very similar. <a href="http://stopsarein.com/2008/11/16/euro-dollar-and-the-market/" rel="nofollow">http://stopsarein.com/2008/11/16/euro-dollar-and-the-market/</a></p>
<p>Here is another EW take. The problem for me as a totally new person to EW is that its coming into my vision in the (i believe 4th wave ) which is very hard to count so im constantly looking for scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-146348</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3230#comment-146348</guid>
		<description>David,

We&#039;ll need large-scale Wave (4) to pull up somewhere in the 1,200 territory or below, and it could be a complex correction because (2) was relatively simple.  Let&#039;s see how far it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll need large-scale Wave (4) to pull up somewhere in the 1,200 territory or below, and it could be a complex correction because (2) was relatively simple.  Let&#8217;s see how far it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-146247</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3230#comment-146247</guid>
		<description>I think this is a comples corrective 4 given to was simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a comples corrective 4 given to was simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-146202</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3230#comment-146202</guid>
		<description>Anon,

Absolutely, and a colleague of mine actually has that count.  If so, Wave 5 just slightly eclipsed that of Wave 4 which would be a semi-truncation.

That&#039;s the beauty of Elliott - we can have our own preferred and alternate counts so long as they follow the basic rules and then meet as many guidelines as possible, allowing for different interpretations.  It&#039;s when alternate and preferred counts &#039;point&#039; in the same direction that we get better signals I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,</p>
<p>Absolutely, and a colleague of mine actually has that count.  If so, Wave 5 just slightly eclipsed that of Wave 4 which would be a semi-truncation.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the beauty of Elliott &#8211; we can have our own preferred and alternate counts so long as they follow the basic rules and then meet as many guidelines as possible, allowing for different interpretations.  It&#8217;s when alternate and preferred counts &#8216;point&#8217; in the same direction that we get better signals I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/possible-elliott-wave-interpretation-for-the-sp-500/comment-page-1/#comment-146189</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3230#comment-146189</guid>
		<description>Corey,
I actually counted your (A) and (B) as the multi-decades 4 and 5 respectively. In that case, we are now at wave A. If the count is correct, we should be at the beginning of (fractal 5) of wave A.
Probable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,<br />
I actually counted your (A) and (B) as the multi-decades 4 and 5 respectively. In that case, we are now at wave A. If the count is correct, we should be at the beginning of (fractal 5) of wave A.<br />
Probable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

