<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SP 500 Hourly Structure Year to Date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:53:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-200208</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-200208</guid>
		<description>My guess is that we should see the small 5th wave unfold April 1st ( it probably started in the sell-off of late Tuesday ) and will most likely target support at the previous 4th wave and a fib retracement of .382 at 769.50</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that we should see the small 5th wave unfold April 1st ( it probably started in the sell-off of late Tuesday ) and will most likely target support at the previous 4th wave and a fib retracement of .382 at 769.50</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-200206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-200206</guid>
		<description>The labeling of your Wave 5 on this diagonal is wrong. It occurred a touch earlier than you have labeled it, and the new high up to 833 SPX is actually a &quot;B&quot; wave with a 1-2-3-4 sequence down &quot;C&quot; thus far ( 3/31/09 ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The labeling of your Wave 5 on this diagonal is wrong. It occurred a touch earlier than you have labeled it, and the new high up to 833 SPX is actually a &#8220;B&#8221; wave with a 1-2-3-4 sequence down &#8220;C&#8221; thus far ( 3/31/09 ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-199020</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-199020</guid>
		<description>http://dshort.com/charts/bears/four-bears-large.gif
Why shouldn&#039;t the bear already been shot at march 9th (SPX 666)? Compare the red and the green SPX bear market ends in the link (sharply V-shaped) and adjust the dark blue one to have the upward rally from its -56.8% low in light blue: no financial Armageddon (yet)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dshort.com/charts/bears/four-bears-large.gif" rel="nofollow">http://dshort.com/charts/bears/four-bears-large.gif</a><br />
Why shouldn&#8217;t the bear already been shot at march 9th (SPX 666)? Compare the red and the green SPX bear market ends in the link (sharply V-shaped) and adjust the dark blue one to have the upward rally from its -56.8% low in light blue: no financial Armageddon (yet)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inq</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-198555</link>
		<dc:creator>Inq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-198555</guid>
		<description>Hi Corey,
New to your site. I&#039;ve been studying Elliott wave recently. Do you think our impulse wave 5 count from march 09 count has ended and that we are now headed downwards?
Thanks
Inq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Corey,<br />
New to your site. I&#8217;ve been studying Elliott wave recently. Do you think our impulse wave 5 count from march 09 count has ended and that we are now headed downwards?<br />
Thanks<br />
Inq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-197621</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-197621</guid>
		<description>Hey Corey, I see you&#039;ve been steadily climbing the Alexa rankings..good on ya mate!

The chart..that mo divergence from Mar 1-9 looks rather steep. So I&#039;m wondering, do you think the steepness of a divergence is any clue as to its validity(like the steeper it is the more likely it is to be a signal for a price reversal)?

Also, you ever use stochastics? Maybe you could do a future post on that indicator..I would be interested to see your use/opinion of it.

thanks!
charleS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Corey, I see you&#8217;ve been steadily climbing the Alexa rankings..good on ya mate!</p>
<p>The chart..that mo divergence from Mar 1-9 looks rather steep. So I&#8217;m wondering, do you think the steepness of a divergence is any clue as to its validity(like the steeper it is the more likely it is to be a signal for a price reversal)?</p>
<p>Also, you ever use stochastics? Maybe you could do a future post on that indicator..I would be interested to see your use/opinion of it.</p>
<p>thanks!<br />
charleS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-197505</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-197505</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

I see your point - I think what I was trying to do was show a 5-wave structure for fractal wave 1 up.  Wave 3 does have a 3-wave structure but iii is the shortest (which is why I chose not to fractalize it).  It might be a better strategy to have 1 and 2 be that little blip, but my logic was to have 1 stand-alone.  

Notice I was sneaky - I&#039;m letting the reader add his/her own interpretation.  I just showed the fractal wave components of the structure without labeling the larger waves.  Some think we&#039;re still in a 4; some think the 5 has already completed.  The fact that we broke 805 threw me off so I had to go back to the basic fractal wave structure and build from there.

I find it hard to believe we&#039;re about to, or are already in an up-impulse (meaning the primary 5 waves have officially completed).

I don&#039;t exactly have the words or Wave count for it (other than we just finished primary 3), but I believe we&#039;re going into some sort of upward correction phase.  The labels will fall into place later but we&#039;ll all have to watch it very carefully as it develops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I see your point &#8211; I think what I was trying to do was show a 5-wave structure for fractal wave 1 up.  Wave 3 does have a 3-wave structure but iii is the shortest (which is why I chose not to fractalize it).  It might be a better strategy to have 1 and 2 be that little blip, but my logic was to have 1 stand-alone.  </p>
<p>Notice I was sneaky &#8211; I&#8217;m letting the reader add his/her own interpretation.  I just showed the fractal wave components of the structure without labeling the larger waves.  Some think we&#8217;re still in a 4; some think the 5 has already completed.  The fact that we broke 805 threw me off so I had to go back to the basic fractal wave structure and build from there.</p>
<p>I find it hard to believe we&#8217;re about to, or are already in an up-impulse (meaning the primary 5 waves have officially completed).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t exactly have the words or Wave count for it (other than we just finished primary 3), but I believe we&#8217;re going into some sort of upward correction phase.  The labels will fall into place later but we&#8217;ll all have to watch it very carefully as it develops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-197499</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-197499</guid>
		<description>Corey,

I&#039;m having a lot of trouble labeling this impulse up since Mar 9.  I ended up with a different labeling than you -- doesn&#039;t your labeling have iii of 3 up as the shortest wave, a rule violation?

Anyway, I have a tiny 1 and 2 at the beginning, then a third wave extension, then my 3 and 4 match yours.  But my channel has wave 5 finishing on Mar 23 or so, and what comes since is labeled as an A-B irregular flat.  In that case we&#039;re just starting an impulse wave C down.  Well, I guess it&#039;s not that different, because the one count calls for an A down and the other a C down.

The next question is whether we&#039;re entering 2 of (1), or B of (4), which I guess you covered in the last post.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a lot of trouble labeling this impulse up since Mar 9.  I ended up with a different labeling than you &#8212; doesn&#8217;t your labeling have iii of 3 up as the shortest wave, a rule violation?</p>
<p>Anyway, I have a tiny 1 and 2 at the beginning, then a third wave extension, then my 3 and 4 match yours.  But my channel has wave 5 finishing on Mar 23 or so, and what comes since is labeled as an A-B irregular flat.  In that case we&#8217;re just starting an impulse wave C down.  Well, I guess it&#8217;s not that different, because the one count calls for an A down and the other a C down.</p>
<p>The next question is whether we&#8217;re entering 2 of (1), or B of (4), which I guess you covered in the last post.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-197490</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-197490</guid>
		<description>Anon,

I love it!  

I used to have a study in TradeStation called the MA Ribbon, that had probably 20 or 30 moving averages of different colors.  Was beautiful like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,</p>
<p>I love it!  </p>
<p>I used to have a study in TradeStation called the MA Ribbon, that had probably 20 or 30 moving averages of different colors.  Was beautiful like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-197481</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-197481</guid>
		<description>Dominick,

Excellent question.

There&#039;s a hierarchy of timeframes, in that higher timeframe signals/structure hold more weight than lower.  

But each timeframe offers its own nuances and opportunities.  

It really depends on the trader and what&#039;s appropriate.  A person with a full time job probably can not trade looking at low timeframe charts - he/she will have to stick to daily and weekly.

However an intraday, 1-min or 5-min chart trader probably won&#039;t get much relavence from a weekly or monthly chart.

All concepts in technical analysis are fractal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dominick,</p>
<p>Excellent question.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a hierarchy of timeframes, in that higher timeframe signals/structure hold more weight than lower.  </p>
<p>But each timeframe offers its own nuances and opportunities.  </p>
<p>It really depends on the trader and what&#8217;s appropriate.  A person with a full time job probably can not trade looking at low timeframe charts &#8211; he/she will have to stick to daily and weekly.</p>
<p>However an intraday, 1-min or 5-min chart trader probably won&#8217;t get much relavence from a weekly or monthly chart.</p>
<p>All concepts in technical analysis are fractal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/sp-500-hourly-structure-year-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-197180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3754#comment-197180</guid>
		<description>Ema fun : http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPX&amp;p=60&amp;yr=0&amp;mn=3&amp;dy=0&amp;id=p07117519197</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ema fun : <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPX&amp;p=60&amp;yr=0&amp;mn=3&amp;dy=0&amp;id=p07117519197" rel="nofollow">http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPX&amp;p=60&amp;yr=0&amp;mn=3&amp;dy=0&amp;id=p07117519197</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

