<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated Andrews Pitchfork Insights for SP500 July 28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Convergence to Watch at 10,500 on Dow Jones &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-211380</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Convergence to Watch at 10,500 on Dow Jones &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-211380</guid>
		<description>[...] July 28th Andrews Pitchfork Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 28th Andrews Pitchfork Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrews Pitchfork Bounce for SP500 Update &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-211166</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrews Pitchfork Bounce for SP500 Update &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-211166</guid>
		<description>[...] July 28th Andrews Pitchfork Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 28th Andrews Pitchfork Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrews Pitchfork Bounce for SP500 Update &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-211134</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrews Pitchfork Bounce for SP500 Update &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-211134</guid>
		<description>[...] July 28th Andrews Pitchfork Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 28th Andrews Pitchfork Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrews Pitchfork Update on SP500 &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-210801</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrews Pitchfork Update on SP500 &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-210801</guid>
		<description>[...] July 28th S&amp;P 500 Update (showing the Fibonacci numbers for the Pitchfork which are still valid) June 18th on the S&amp;P 500 (which show the &#8217;standard&#8217; Andrews Tool) May 13th S&amp;P 500 which shows a Downward Pitchfork from the Market Highs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 28th S&amp;P 500 Update (showing the Fibonacci numbers for the Pitchfork which are still valid) June 18th on the S&amp;P 500 (which show the &#8217;standard&#8217; Andrews Tool) May 13th S&amp;P 500 which shows a Downward Pitchfork from the Market Highs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrews Pitchfork Update on SP500 &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-210770</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrews Pitchfork Update on SP500 &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-210770</guid>
		<description>[...] July 28th S&amp;P 500 Update (showing the Fibonacci numbers for the Pitchfork which are still valid) June 18th on the S&amp;P 500 (which show the &#8217;standard&#8217; Andrews Tool) May 13th S&amp;P 500 which shows a Downward Pitchfork from the Market Highs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 28th S&amp;P 500 Update (showing the Fibonacci numbers for the Pitchfork which are still valid) June 18th on the S&amp;P 500 (which show the &#8217;standard&#8217; Andrews Tool) May 13th S&amp;P 500 which shows a Downward Pitchfork from the Market Highs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-212647</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-212647</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to the Pitchfork concept and have yet to read up on the topic. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking at the projections, it appears future price directionality and projections are a result of identifying a historic price move (a completed leg) and drawing the slope of that leg, then projecting three lines perpendicular to that slope at the 0%, 50% and 100%. This seems to point at a &quot;reversion to the mean&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Taking it a step further, you&#039;ve then added the fibonacci retracement levels parallel to the directionality defined by the pitchfork projection. These levels then function as support &amp; resistance; a sloped fibonacci retracement grid.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an interesting interpertation. The horizontal fibonacci retracement levels have always seemed somewhat out of synch and more a result of charting constraints. I like the new spin! Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m new to the Pitchfork concept and have yet to read up on the topic. </p>
<p>Looking at the projections, it appears future price directionality and projections are a result of identifying a historic price move (a completed leg) and drawing the slope of that leg, then projecting three lines perpendicular to that slope at the 0%, 50% and 100%. This seems to point at a &#8220;reversion to the mean&#8221;.</p>
<p>Taking it a step further, you&#39;ve then added the fibonacci retracement levels parallel to the directionality defined by the pitchfork projection. These levels then function as support &#038; resistance; a sloped fibonacci retracement grid.</p>
<p>This is an interesting interpertation. The horizontal fibonacci retracement levels have always seemed somewhat out of synch and more a result of charting constraints. I like the new spin! Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-212650</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-212650</guid>
		<description>I do hope you&#039;re not suggesting using one analysis tool in isolation.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trading comes from edge, not accuracy.  The benefit is that we have a level to inflect off of with a tight stop IF it is confirmed by other forms of analysis.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The tight stop relative to the larger target generates EDGE which is more important than accuracy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;d all love to have a tool that works 100% of the time - but it doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do hope you&#39;re not suggesting using one analysis tool in isolation.  </p>
<p>Trading comes from edge, not accuracy.  The benefit is that we have a level to inflect off of with a tight stop IF it is confirmed by other forms of analysis.  </p>
<p>The tight stop relative to the larger target generates EDGE which is more important than accuracy.</p>
<p>We&#39;d all love to have a tool that works 100% of the time &#8211; but it doesn&#39;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-212649</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-212649</guid>
		<description>Ole,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly!  One of my weaknesses is Log charting - I&#039;m so used to doing everything with arithmetic but you can indeed get some alternate insights from log charts which can be more important (as fewer people are looking at them).  Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ole,</p>
<p>Exactly!  One of my weaknesses is Log charting &#8211; I&#39;m so used to doing everything with arithmetic but you can indeed get some alternate insights from log charts which can be more important (as fewer people are looking at them).  Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ole</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-212648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-212648</guid>
		<description>Using the pitchfork with log scaling is quite informative.  I have been following this fork on log scale for a while and so far it stopped the advance on 7/24 at the median line</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the pitchfork with log scaling is quite informative.  I have been following this fork on log scale for a while and so far it stopped the advance on 7/24 at the median line</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/updated-andrews-pitchfork-insights-for-sp500-july-28/comment-page-1/#comment-210003</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4383#comment-210003</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to the Pitchfork concept and have yet to read up on the topic. Looking at the projections, it appears future price directionality and projections are a result of identifying a historic price move (a completed leg), drawing the slope of that leg, and projecting three lines perpendicular to that slope at the 0%, 50% and 100%. Taking it a step further, you&#039;ve then added the fibonacci retracement levels parallel to the directionality defined by the pitchfork projection. These levels then function as support &amp; resistance, essentially like fibonacci retracement levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m new to the Pitchfork concept and have yet to read up on the topic. Looking at the projections, it appears future price directionality and projections are a result of identifying a historic price move (a completed leg), drawing the slope of that leg, and projecting three lines perpendicular to that slope at the 0%, 50% and 100%. Taking it a step further, you&#39;ve then added the fibonacci retracement levels parallel to the directionality defined by the pitchfork projection. These levels then function as support &#038; resistance, essentially like fibonacci retracement levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

