<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly and Daily Conflicting Opportunites in IBM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goldman Sachs GS Threatens to form Cradle Sell Signal &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-211178</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldman Sachs GS Threatens to form Cradle Sell Signal &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-211178</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Daily and Weekly Conflicting Opportunities in IBM.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Daily and Weekly Conflicting Opportunities in IBM.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldman Sachs GS Threatens to form Cradle Sell Signal &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-211173</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldman Sachs GS Threatens to form Cradle Sell Signal &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-211173</guid>
		<description>[...] This is similar to the situation I highlighted occurred for IBM in my July 24th post &#8220;Daily and Weekly Conflicting Opportunities in IBM.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is similar to the situation I highlighted occurred for IBM in my July 24th post &#8220;Daily and Weekly Conflicting Opportunities in IBM.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updated Post on IBM Shows Why Multiple Timeframe Analysis is Critical &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-210228</link>
		<dc:creator>Updated Post on IBM Shows Why Multiple Timeframe Analysis is Critical &#124; Penny Stock Trading System Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-210228</guid>
		<description>[...] on whether you examined the Weekly or Daily timeframe.  Please reference the original post &#8220;Conflicting Signals in IBM&#8221; which was also published at the MoneyShow.com for the background before reading the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on whether you examined the Weekly or Daily timeframe.  Please reference the original post &#8220;Conflicting Signals in IBM&#8221; which was also published at the MoneyShow.com for the background before reading the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updated Post on IBM Shows Why Multiple Timeframe Analysis is Critical &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-210220</link>
		<dc:creator>Updated Post on IBM Shows Why Multiple Timeframe Analysis is Critical &#124; Afraid to Trade.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-210220</guid>
		<description>[...] on whether you examined the Weekly or Daily timeframe.  Please reference the original post &#8220;Conflicting Signals in IBM&#8221; which was also published at the MoneyShow.com for the background before reading the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on whether you examined the Weekly or Daily timeframe.  Please reference the original post &#8220;Conflicting Signals in IBM&#8221; which was also published at the MoneyShow.com for the background before reading the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-213406</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-213406</guid>
		<description>Hey Reggie!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right - it&#039;s not often we come into such significant nodes where we are now, but when the indexes come into a possible turning point, many internal (major) stocks like IBM will often show similar turning points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m trying to find big leader stocks to get a leg-up on the possible next move in the S&amp;P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Reggie!</p>
<p>Right &#8211; it&#39;s not often we come into such significant nodes where we are now, but when the indexes come into a possible turning point, many internal (major) stocks like IBM will often show similar turning points.</p>
<p>I&#39;m trying to find big leader stocks to get a leg-up on the possible next move in the S&#038;P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-213403</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-213403</guid>
		<description>Bo,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point - I was counting it as a Wave A down from the high; Wave B (which is a 3-wave structure) to present, and then perhaps Wave C down to form a zig-zag.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Daily has indeed taken some big damage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m watching $100 very closely for a bounce but might get short if the broader market breaks down from the H&amp;S as IBM would be breaking significant support as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bo,</p>
<p>Good point &#8211; I was counting it as a Wave A down from the high; Wave B (which is a 3-wave structure) to present, and then perhaps Wave C down to form a zig-zag.</p>
<p>Daily has indeed taken some big damage.</p>
<p>I&#39;m watching $100 very closely for a bounce but might get short if the broader market breaks down from the H&#038;S as IBM would be breaking significant support as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bo jengles</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-213404</link>
		<dc:creator>bo jengles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-213404</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm... Rather than an ABC wave I see a full up wave happening on the weekly chart.  It is on the 4th (counter trend) wave and should have one more up wave.  The daily looks pretty bad but I noticed a ton of congestion when it passed 100 the last time, that&#039;ll act as support.  It also looks like a small ABC retracement.  That being said, it broke below a trendline and the averages as you mentioned so it definitely isn&#039;t a long play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230; Rather than an ABC wave I see a full up wave happening on the weekly chart.  It is on the 4th (counter trend) wave and should have one more up wave.  The daily looks pretty bad but I noticed a ton of congestion when it passed 100 the last time, that&#39;ll act as support.  It also looks like a small ABC retracement.  That being said, it broke below a trendline and the averages as you mentioned so it definitely isn&#39;t a long play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Perrin</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-213405</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-213405</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the major markets seem on the verge of POTENTIAL major moves&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The time of year, the lack of volume and the lack of volatility however are puzzling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis</p>
<p>All the major markets seem on the verge of POTENTIAL major moves</p>
<p>The time of year, the lack of volume and the lack of volatility however are puzzling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-209814</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-209814</guid>
		<description>Hey Reggie!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right - it&#039;s not often we come into such significant nodes where we are now, but when the indexes come into a possible turning point, many internal (major) stocks like IBM will often show similar turning points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m trying to find big leader stocks to get a leg-up on the possible next move in the S&amp;P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Reggie!</p>
<p>Right &#8211; it&#39;s not often we come into such significant nodes where we are now, but when the indexes come into a possible turning point, many internal (major) stocks like IBM will often show similar turning points.</p>
<p>I&#39;m trying to find big leader stocks to get a leg-up on the possible next move in the S&#038;P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/weekly-and-daily-conflicting-analysis-on-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-209813</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom, CMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=4259#comment-209813</guid>
		<description>Bo,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point - I was counting it as a Wave A down from the high; Wave B (which is a 3-wave structure) to present, and then perhaps Wave C down to form a zig-zag.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Daily has indeed taken some big damage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m watching $100 very closely for a bounce but might get short if the broader market breaks down from the H&amp;S as IBM would be breaking significant support as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bo,</p>
<p>Good point &#8211; I was counting it as a Wave A down from the high; Wave B (which is a 3-wave structure) to present, and then perhaps Wave C down to form a zig-zag.</p>
<p>Daily has indeed taken some big damage.</p>
<p>I&#39;m watching $100 very closely for a bounce but might get short if the broader market breaks down from the H&#038;S as IBM would be breaking significant support as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

