<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re All Set to Test or Break the November Lows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/</link>
	<description>Helping traders overcome fears and emotions in trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don-Da-Mon</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-176311</link>
		<dc:creator>Don-Da-Mon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-176311</guid>
		<description>Concerning - Dyugle, on January 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pm Said:  I see this a little bit different as I feel that we are in wave 4. We are currently in the b fractal of wave 4.

Did we just start C in wave 4? It feels like we are headed up here, short term. It seems volumes are up confirming this change? 

Corey give us another EW post!! Can&#039;t get enough!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning &#8211; Dyugle, on January 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pm Said:  I see this a little bit different as I feel that we are in wave 4. We are currently in the b fractal of wave 4.</p>
<p>Did we just start C in wave 4? It feels like we are headed up here, short term. It seems volumes are up confirming this change? </p>
<p>Corey give us another EW post!! Can&#8217;t get enough!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-171610</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-171610</guid>
		<description>Dacian,

I have things I&#039;d love to say about Prechter&#039;s &quot;Dow 400&quot; projection but I prefer to keep the blog civil :)  I&#039;ve read his report.

I believe the best analysis is done not blinded by bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dacian,</p>
<p>I have things I&#8217;d love to say about Prechter&#8217;s &#8220;Dow 400&#8243; projection but I prefer to keep the blog civil <img src='http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;ve read his report.</p>
<p>I believe the best analysis is done not blinded by bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-171609</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-171609</guid>
		<description>Dyugle,

That&#039;s another alternate count we&#039;re holding as well - that of the &quot;this is B wave down of a larger complex corrective&quot; which ends in a C wave rally (but not beyond 1,000) before plunging into the final 5.

You&#039;re right about staying out of corrective waves.  I posted a while ago that we were in Wave 4 up but it&#039;s been absolutely hideous for bulls &amp; bears.  Let&#039;s get back to an impulse wave - which would be down - so that things could go a little smoothly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dyugle,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s another alternate count we&#8217;re holding as well &#8211; that of the &#8220;this is B wave down of a larger complex corrective&#8221; which ends in a C wave rally (but not beyond 1,000) before plunging into the final 5.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about staying out of corrective waves.  I posted a while ago that we were in Wave 4 up but it&#8217;s been absolutely hideous for bulls &#038; bears.  Let&#8217;s get back to an impulse wave &#8211; which would be down &#8211; so that things could go a little smoothly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-171608</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-171608</guid>
		<description>Dacian,

I agree that a squeeze will drive faster upside prices than hopeful bulls - it always seems to in bear markets.

I don&#039;t know - perhaps it&#039;s a &#039;social mood&#039; thing.  Inaugurations aren&#039;t magical but people feel that they are.  People feel bad now and see a new guy taking the Oval Office desk will make them feel better so perhaps they buy on that feeling.  I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dacian,</p>
<p>I agree that a squeeze will drive faster upside prices than hopeful bulls &#8211; it always seems to in bear markets.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8211; perhaps it&#8217;s a &#8217;social mood&#8217; thing.  Inaugurations aren&#8217;t magical but people feel that they are.  People feel bad now and see a new guy taking the Oval Office desk will make them feel better so perhaps they buy on that feeling.  I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-171603</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-171603</guid>
		<description>NotAfraid,

I need to write that in a post.

In sum, I&#039;ve been focused on the 30 Dow Stocks for the life of my career, so I know them more intimately and understand the pricing (for better or worse, I&#039;ve always been used to the Dow Index numbers)

Trading in $5 per 1 point moves is more intuitive for me than the ES which trades in $12.50 per quarter moves.
I like to know dollar figures so it&#039;s for me far more intuitive to do so with @YM.

Liquidity isn&#039;t so much an issue for me as I trade in relatively small size.  

Too many people are focused on the ES which leaves breathing room in the @YM (too many hard-core professionals trading ES and there seem to be more &#039;tricks&#039; played in ES than YM)

That&#039;s just a few off the top of my head.  I&#039;d love to hear others&#039; thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NotAfraid,</p>
<p>I need to write that in a post.</p>
<p>In sum, I&#8217;ve been focused on the 30 Dow Stocks for the life of my career, so I know them more intimately and understand the pricing (for better or worse, I&#8217;ve always been used to the Dow Index numbers)</p>
<p>Trading in $5 per 1 point moves is more intuitive for me than the ES which trades in $12.50 per quarter moves.<br />
I like to know dollar figures so it&#8217;s for me far more intuitive to do so with @YM.</p>
<p>Liquidity isn&#8217;t so much an issue for me as I trade in relatively small size.  </p>
<p>Too many people are focused on the ES which leaves breathing room in the @YM (too many hard-core professionals trading ES and there seem to be more &#8216;tricks&#8217; played in ES than YM)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just a few off the top of my head.  I&#8217;d love to hear others&#8217; thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotAfraidofTrend</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-171594</link>
		<dc:creator>NotAfraidofTrend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-171594</guid>
		<description>dacian, as you say, that the rallies in bear markets are caused by bears makes a lot of sense. Please let me know if I got this wrong.

First, who has control in a bear market? It must be the bears who are downward swings. The bulls are probably on sidelines. 

Then, all bears are not alike. There are some bears who are a lot bigger in size than others. They are the ones who have the resources to cause the rallies after they are flushed with cash, after having covered their shorts. They  cause a rally to create another selling opportunity, and hopefully trapping some bulls along the way.

For the most part, most bulls can&#039;t be very active in a bear market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dacian, as you say, that the rallies in bear markets are caused by bears makes a lot of sense. Please let me know if I got this wrong.</p>
<p>First, who has control in a bear market? It must be the bears who are downward swings. The bulls are probably on sidelines. </p>
<p>Then, all bears are not alike. There are some bears who are a lot bigger in size than others. They are the ones who have the resources to cause the rallies after they are flushed with cash, after having covered their shorts. They  cause a rally to create another selling opportunity, and hopefully trapping some bulls along the way.</p>
<p>For the most part, most bulls can&#8217;t be very active in a bear market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dacian</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-171371</link>
		<dc:creator>dacian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-171371</guid>
		<description>&quot;If we go to November lows this time, we won’t bounce back for a long time. Buyers won’t have the conviction, to be honest, how many times can they buy to see it go lower again?&quot;

Anon, is that the bottom? And btw, the biggest rallies in the bear markets are initiated by the bears themselves. At levels we hear today for the bottom (400-600 range), I think there will be value investor buyers.

Of course, you have Prechter who sees the end of the bear market at 400 on the Dow (yes, the Dow, not S&amp;P!), but I&#039;m not sure if there will be many survivors on the planet Earth by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If we go to November lows this time, we won’t bounce back for a long time. Buyers won’t have the conviction, to be honest, how many times can they buy to see it go lower again?&#8221;</p>
<p>Anon, is that the bottom? And btw, the biggest rallies in the bear markets are initiated by the bears themselves. At levels we hear today for the bottom (400-600 range), I think there will be value investor buyers.</p>
<p>Of course, you have Prechter who sees the end of the bear market at 400 on the Dow (yes, the Dow, not S&amp;P!), but I&#8217;m not sure if there will be many survivors on the planet Earth by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyugle</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-170502</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyugle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-170502</guid>
		<description>I see this a little bit different as I feel that we are in wave 4.  We are currently in the b fractal of wave 4.  The logic is that the b fractal should probably end on options expiry week on a weird wally Wednesday.  That is today so a solid down move to end the fractal was expected.  Between now and monday I expect the b fractal to end and the c fractal to begin.  Big bailout weekend type of news as these bailouts seem to happen over the weekend.  I also feel that the slow stoicastic has yet to flip over to oversold which is a hallmark of a wave down just as an over bought signal is the halmark of an up wave.  We have had a very strong overbought signal at the start of wave 4 so it is probably not a fractal and the c wave of wave 4 has not materialized yet.  The wave could be truncated or course and that points to your possibilities.  Bottom line is trading this wave 4 is very difficult and I am glad that I covered my shorts when wave 3 was ending but getting short again is proving to be difficult.  My targets for the end of the b fractal, based on the fractals within the b fractal, are 780, 819, 843, 884 and 903.
Good trading and love the blog even if my counts are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this a little bit different as I feel that we are in wave 4.  We are currently in the b fractal of wave 4.  The logic is that the b fractal should probably end on options expiry week on a weird wally Wednesday.  That is today so a solid down move to end the fractal was expected.  Between now and monday I expect the b fractal to end and the c fractal to begin.  Big bailout weekend type of news as these bailouts seem to happen over the weekend.  I also feel that the slow stoicastic has yet to flip over to oversold which is a hallmark of a wave down just as an over bought signal is the halmark of an up wave.  We have had a very strong overbought signal at the start of wave 4 so it is probably not a fractal and the c wave of wave 4 has not materialized yet.  The wave could be truncated or course and that points to your possibilities.  Bottom line is trading this wave 4 is very difficult and I am glad that I covered my shorts when wave 3 was ending but getting short again is proving to be difficult.  My targets for the end of the b fractal, based on the fractals within the b fractal, are 780, 819, 843, 884 and 903.<br />
Good trading and love the blog even if my counts are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dacian</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-170477</link>
		<dc:creator>dacian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-170477</guid>
		<description>We had that for the election; it&#039;s too easy to have the same this time. I don&#039;t know, we might, but why exactly will have a bounce for the inauguration? Just to say hello? There are no buyers for that; it might come from a squeeze. We might have a squeeze when the 700$ billion is discussed and voted; by then, 3.5 or 5.1 will play out I suppose (they think now a bill can be passed the soonest in February). So there you have it for the 4-up or 5.2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had that for the election; it&#8217;s too easy to have the same this time. I don&#8217;t know, we might, but why exactly will have a bounce for the inauguration? Just to say hello? There are no buyers for that; it might come from a squeeze. We might have a squeeze when the 700$ billion is discussed and voted; by then, 3.5 or 5.1 will play out I suppose (they think now a bill can be passed the soonest in February). So there you have it for the 4-up or 5.2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotAfraidofTrend</title>
		<link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/were-all-set-to-test-or-break-the-november-lows/comment-page-1/#comment-170343</link>
		<dc:creator>NotAfraidofTrend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/?p=3560#comment-170343</guid>
		<description>Corey, you mentioned in another of your blogs that you had some reasons for trading YM instead of ES. I traded YM today. YM does provide finer &quot;resolution&quot; at $5 per point as compared with ES but YM has very low trading volume, hence lower liquidity. If you don&#039;t mind, please let us know your reasons for trading YM instead of ES. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey, you mentioned in another of your blogs that you had some reasons for trading YM instead of ES. I traded YM today. YM does provide finer &#8220;resolution&#8221; at $5 per point as compared with ES but YM has very low trading volume, hence lower liquidity. If you don&#8217;t mind, please let us know your reasons for trading YM instead of ES. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

