Which Elliott 4th Wave Are We In Currently?

Dec 16, 2008: 1:10 PM CST

There’s a rather large debate currently brewing among Ellioticians regarding exactly which Elliott 4th Wave we are experiencing – though there’s widespread agreement we are in a 4th Wave Counter-rally.  Let’s look briefly at both sides of the argument, and what it might mean for the near future – don’t miss this post.

I’ll present the first argument first.  Elliotticians are generally in agreement until October 2008, in that we all generally agree that Waves 1 and 2 have transpired… but that’s where the agreement stops.  The first argument states that the massive (and destructive) 3rd Wave down has completed at the November price low of 746 on the S&P 500, and that we are currently in a large-scale 4th Wave which should take us to at least 1,000 to 1,100 on the S&P 500 … before embarking on a final 5th Wave down perhaps mid-2009.

Let’s look at the proposed wave count for this argument:

The agreement stops roughly in August where the fractal 2nd wave (around 1,325) takes place.  These believe fractal wave iii of the larger 3rd wave ended in October, iv ended a week later, and the v fractal wave of 3 completed also in October, and we got a quick rally up to complete Fractal 4 and then the final fifth fractal (5) of the 3rd wave completed in November.  Look closely at the chart if the textual description doesn’t make sense.

(Note – in my labeling a circle means a large-scale wave, a 1 means a fractal of the large scale wave, and Roman numerals – i – mean a fractal of the ‘fractal’ wave).

The implication of this view is that we are *currently* in a large scale Fourth Wave which should play out similarly (perhaps) to the pathway I’ve drawn above.  Also, this would put the final price low projection somewhere around 650 to 600 when the Final 5th Wave completes.  This is the more tame or mild view in terms of what’s in store for the market.

The weakness of this argument is in the fact that the fractal 4 and 5 waves do not match proportionally with the fractal wave 2 of the larger 3rd Wave Impulse.  The fractal 2 took 2 months to complete while fractal 4 took 2 weeks and fractal 5 took three weeks – clearly that is not in proportion and should cause alarm from a time-perspective.

What is the alternate Elliott view?

The projection is a little more complex on this one, but it seems to meet the proportion argument a little better.

In this case, the September lows ended fractal iii of 3 while we gave a little more time for fractal iv of 3 to play out, and still more time for fractal v of 3 to play out, which terminated at the November lows.  If fractal 3 of large-scale three completed there, then we are currently in *Fractal 4* of large scale 3… meaning we still have more downside to go soon in this hideous Third Wave.

Technically, we would be somewhere in a “b” or perhaps even the “c” wave of the 4th wave… though others interpret the recent action as an Elliott Triangle consolidation 4th Wave (which would require me showing the daily and intraday charts for a better explanation – I mean to keep this to top-level analysis for the moment).  Either way, it’s a 4th wave movement.

I must admit that I am leaning more towards this interpretation… but I encourage you to do your own analysis.

This seems to satisfy the time requirements generally accepted in Elliott Analysis better than the first interpretation.  Perhaps it also satisfies the overall economic realities – that we’re in for a long and difficult 2009.

The implication for this view is far more bearish for the market.  It implies that the rally we’re experiencing now will be weaker, raise to a lower level, and then plunge quickly to take out the November lows before marking a final end to this devastating large-scale 3rd Wave.

Of course, after the 3rd Wave completes, we’ll likely get a large-scale 4th Wave rally (into a lower level that the prior interpretation allows) and then plunge lower (perhaps to the S&P level of 450 to 500) before the final 5th Wave is in – this clearly would not be the view you would want to go around expousing publicly.

Remember that Elliott Wave analysis is only one of the many ways to interpret the market, and we’re all trying to figure out the probabilities as we understand them and then manage our risk appropriately.

I’m new to the Elliott world, so I strongly encourage readers to share your thoughts and opinions in the comment section, and to discuss among yourselves here as well.

Corey Rosenbloom
Afraid to Trade.com

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Comments
  • It is a good analysis, I think it will helpful for us.
  • john davies
    I've amended my annalysis of the nikkei 225, if anyone tracks this market I will be interested in your analysis.
    It seems that it has completed the first wave (composed of five waves) of an overall presumed five wave downward move and just, it seems, recently entered a second reaction wave.
    It seems it will be a couple or many years completing the overall downward path, which will mark it seems the overall end of the bear market which in the case of the nikkei started in late 1989,
    The third wave will I imagine (in view of the first) be long and fairly devastating.
    I assume that the major world markets will turn up as and when the nikkei eventually turns up into the bull market, eventually being the operative word.
    The coppack philosophy which allows an approx twelve month "mourning" period particulary after a supercycle could possibly mean a delay to the start of a bull market, to my knowledge elliott had nothing to say about the strength of the turn relative to the severity of the bear market.
    The elliott wave, though certainly open to different and wrong interpretations in some market conditions, from my experience, it is the best long term indicator available.
    The nikkei more so than many markets has followed to my mind a classic pattern for many years and should be given greater attention by more analysts in my view.
  • john davies
    My interest is when it is over and the bottom is reached. So I can buy unit trusts in Japan
    Presumably it will be world wide issue, the nikkei for example bottoming when the s&p does, the nikkei seems to be starting a reacion wave mid way in the three wave bear market and so the 'bottom' is a long way off in the time aspect. Could you include the nikkei 225 in you apparently detailed analysis? its a facinating market.
    john
  • Jeff Cooley
    Often simple wave ii are followed by complex wave iv and differ quite a bit in time and price. Wave iv tend to be complex and congested and difficult to trade.
    Just found your site;Love it!
  • chris
    Corey,

    Do you have any updates based on market close Friday Jan. 2nd above key areas. Which of these two patterns in Wave 4 now appears most likely to play out?

    Thanks
  • JBN
    In response to #51.

    I'm not expecting EW to be "right" 100% of the time. My position is that EW has no ability to give probabilities greater than %50 (chance).

    There are numerous problems with EW:

    Many market movements cannot be counted as 3's or 5's, even if you go down to one minute charts or tick data. 3's and 5's often have to be forced to agree with the someone's interpretation. Although the counts are supposed to be consistent across time scales, our current access to high frequency data (as opposed to Elliott's hourly DJIA) does not provide support for wave counts as it should.

    EW ignores continuous time. What happens to the waves when the market closes? What about trading in other countries or before and after markets close in the US? These data are almost always ignored.

    Fibonacci ratios fail to appear more often than they do appear. etc..

    Perfect hindsight, zero foresight.

    Please remember that leading practitioners of EW have been continuously (for years) and greatly wrong on the markets.
  • really fascinating thread; only happened onto this site because of a mention on mish's site, very grateful for the link

    re "practitioners can wiggle out of any forecast..." - # 50 above,

    i'm relatively new to EW, but quickly came to appreciate it for it's probabilistic set-ups, rather than concrete forecasts, which, no one i've ever read, has ever been 100% correct on

    i like the acknowledgment that decisions and responsibilities are still up to the individual in regard to his or her own monies

    more than i can say for the financials, who've, so far, gotten $3 trillion (from us) for their (evidently) riskless forecasts :-)
  • JBN
    I'm surprised that there are all these comments, yet no one realizes that EW is useless. There is always an EW count that is bearish and bullish, and practitioners can wiggle out of any forecast. EW is a classification system with sufficient flexibility to "label" anything, but it has no predictive power. Today, (as in the drops of 1987 and 2002) you can make a case that the bottom is in, or that there's much further downside. How is that useful?

    I have seen people duped by EW for 30 years. EW is seductive in its seemingly scientific background. I learned the hard (and expensive) way a long time ago.
  • Rudy
    Hi Corey,

    I only just checked out your website and found it fascinating. Drawing a line from the termination point of your circle 1 wave to your circle 3 wave and then drawing a line parallel to this line to estimate where the circle 4 wave will terminate, it looks like we are very close to that termination point.

    Assuming that the Friday close of 887.9 as an estimated termination point for wave circle 4 we could assume that wave circle 5 would possibly terminate at 568.8. I have used the concept of waves circle 1 and 5 being of equal range. Would you agree with that assessment?
  • samir india
    Great post as always mr. Corey,
    When i draw regression trend channel from wave 2 to downside i think we are still in wave 3 our argue also supported by osc 5/35. i think we are clearly in wave 3 continue.
  • Anonymous
    Great post judging from how many comments have been received.
    Response to #44. I do not count the pattern being formed from the November low as a triangle.
    Response to #46. Again it is called a running triangle if wave B moves beyond the START of wave A. According to Prechter, running triangle is a very common pattern. I am talking the definition, not the current pattern of the market.
  • Anon #42

    I've seen a few interpretations with that count but I've instantly dismissed them - maybe I shouldn't have. I'm not aware of such a pattern and I need to learn more about it.

    Is B the only wave allowed to move beyond A? And if so, how much invalidates that opinion?
  • MMrza,

    I hope so. I'm fine in this market and I know many traders... or at least some traders... are fine but I honestly am worrying about investors who are riding this out. I hear it frequently: "It's gone down this much. No point in selling here. When I sell, it will be at the bottom anyway" or worse "Gosh, it's so cheap - I have to buy at this level".

    We won't see a bottom until the thinking shifts almost universally in the investment class to "Oh my god how awful - I wish I had sold when I had the chance. I can't take this. Get me out."

    Sadly, that will be the bottom and we're not there yet.

    And I feel like we're going to break the 700 level but beyond that, my brain locks up thinking that far in advance and what it will mean.
  • Dave
    Thanks #42&#43. Is the thought that the ABCDE contracting triangle will resolve as a continuation of the prevailing trend? Is it the same probability as a symmetric triangle (which is usually a continuation of trend), or is the probability higher, since it could mean the end of wave 4?
  • Anonymous
    Correction to comment #42. The last sentence should read "...... if wave B moves beyond the start of wave A".
  • Anonymous
    This is a response to comment #37. The wave A needs not to contain both the high and the low of the triangle. It is called a "running triangle" if wave B moves beyond the end of wave A
  • Anonymous
    Has anyone succeeded in using Elliott for intraday trading of SP FUTURES?CAN YOU POST METHOD HERE?
  • Rene
    Fancy program! Thx :)
  • mmrza
    Hi Corey,Im in the first possibility camp also,the fith wave down is clear as a bell to me .The wave we are in now seems to be trading in a fourth wave style.Hard to predict how far the fith wave will go down.Of course it will depend on the recovery out of the ression.My guess is that it will only test the current low for a double bottom.
  • Don,

    You're right - Elliott analysis is so fascinating to me and many others, and I'm so happy with the interaction it generates and ideas I pick up from readers (and they share amongst themselves).

    Whenever I watch Cramer, it's usually by accident and I try to stay out of the "bash Cramer" fray but sometimes he just permeates the investment media somehow. He's great at promotion and bringing interest to investing, but I think we could do without throwing money all over the set.

    I love the Market Club group but I get the sense that Adam and crew are not Ellioticians, but favor more traditional analysis in terms of indicators and chart patterns.

    True, I saw the descending triangle as well, but overruled it due to the multiple positive divergences and Elliott Wave structure unfolding - and am glad I did. That's not to say the same result will happen ever time - I guess I got lucky this time.

    We'll see what happens if and when we do play out that hideous upcoming 5th wave. My guess is that come S&P; values around 500-600, there will be so few people who are bullish it won't be funny. Alas, that is how bottoms are formed. Not in optimism, but in despair.
  • Dave,

    Unless I'm mistaken - and I very well may be - Elliott triangles are 5-wave affairs with each wave breaking into a 3-wave fractal. Generally, the waves constrict, such that B is less than A; C is smaller than B until we form a final ejection point (in this case down probably). As such, as the waves constrict, my understanding is that the A wave move would contain - in theory - both the highs and lows of the entire triangle formation.

    I'd be happy if any other reader could provide clarity on that point.
  • Rene,

    It's a top secret!

    Just kidding - it's Snag-It v7 from TechSmith Software. It's only $30 I think and is quite a versatile tool - I highly recommend it.
  • MTNGuy,

    I use floor pivots as well in my intraday trading, but haven't done much work with weekly or even monthly pivots. That's an interesting topic, one of which I'll explore further.

    Agreed that EW analysis can be subjective, but it's just one of the tools to help categorize and classify market action and price possibilities as best we can with the albeit limited information we have.
  • Don-Da-Mon
    Cramer recently said put aside the money you'll need in the next 5 year into FDIC CDs/Bank Accounts. Perhaps it was October/Nov 2008. Not sure about 2002.

    This blog entry is getting the same extraordinary commentary as the last time you posted the potential wave 4 completion when at the same time the Market Club host had a video which was expecting another down move on a descending triangle, I believe. At that time, I was leaning toward scenario #2 where you're interpretation was mildly more optimistic as scenario #1. I've entered long about a month ago and am looking to get out soon.

    Corey, thanks for posting this entry. It becomes even more valuable with the reader comments. I look forward to the future posts that 4 is completed and more interesting 5 is completed where perhaps we'll see an entry heading "Bottom!!!!!!".
  • DavDave
    ToTo clarify, the ABCDE pattern assumes that wave 3(of3)ended on 10/28/08. So A is on 11/4/08, B is on 11/21/08, and we are waiting for C.
  • Dave
    Corey,
    If we are in an (ABCDE) triangle for wave 4 (of3), is it necessary that (E) ends up higher than the end of wave 3 (of3)? If so, how much higher (if there are any guidelines). It looks like the triangle would result in very little upward correction.

    Thanks a bunch!
  • planetelex
    Great post Corey! Very helpful - thanks.
  • Rene
    Another great post! Corey: which program do you use for our annotations? I can see that it is not the standard stockcharts.
  • mtnguy
    elliot waves are too subjective imo

    I use floor traders pivot points .... daily and monthly! There my best trading tools.
  • Vasu,

    You bring up quite an excellent point that I haven't thought of, nor heard from anyone else - excellent thinking!

    The XLF does indeed appear to have completed a clear 5 wave fractal move down from the same time the market started its violent (circled) third wave move down. The wave structure is quite evident.

    Financials do lead, and all eyes will (or at least should) be focused there for clues on how the market as a whole (and then the economy) might behave.

    It looks sort of like the most recent rally in XLF has been a 45 degree angle on reduced volume, which screams to me "bear flag" so it might not have much upside potential. Even still, if the XLF is still in (circled) Wave 3, then heaven help us all again.
  • NotAfraid,

    I've actually been trading long successfully during this rally (and have been pointing out key opportunities on the blog - though sort of in code), but I did so with the conviction that the mean 3rd wave has ended and that we're in the larger 4th wave and that there's very often an "End of Year" or holiday (Santa Claus) rally into the New Year (sort of a seasonal pattern).

    I now temper that view, believing - sort of - that the 3rd wave is not over yet and that I just got really lucky, sort of like picking up pennies and dollars in front of a steamroller.

    Hang in there! We are going down, but let the bulls have their fun - they deserve it after what they went through in the recent hideous third wave.
  • NotAfraid,

    I'm with you there again. It would surprise me - though not overly so - if we did get that 50% Fib retracement. The 38.2% is far more likely, so the 950 target would be about all the market could muster.

    I still can't get over the public's appetite for risk in this environment - at least among people to whom I speak casually here in the evenings. The thought process goes one of two ways:

    1. "Well, I've already lost this much. Might as well stay in. The moment I get out is when we'll bottom" meaning they've not capitulated but will do so at some point perhaps

    2. "My gosh stocks are so cheap - I just have to buy in now - they can't be at these levels forever!"

    That's true, but we might not see decent price advances for a year or more - while they may be willing to hold that long or longer, it sure won't feel good if the market - and their chosen stocks - fall 20%, 30%, or god help us another 50% from this level.

    The thing I'm NOT hearing from people (that aren't market professionals)? "Oh my gosh it's so terrible I have to get out right now!"
  • NotAfraid,

    That's what I mean about TV people. Cramer came on TV today and started throwing money around and had a headline something like "It's time to get back in the game!" meaning - I thought - get back in the market now.

    I also read a quote today - quite by coincidence - that stated that Mr. Cramer strongly advocated getting totally out of the market in October 2002, which was roughly the absolute bottom of the market - his quote was something like "Take whatever money you're going to need for the next 5 years and get it out of the market".

    Like we know, the bottom will come when people don't want to hear the words "Stock Market" and everyone who wants to sell, will have already sold. Clearly, we're not there yet with TV people proclaiming "The Bottom is Here!"

    Either way you interpret it, and no matter how far out your Elliott interpretation, I would say 99% if not 100% of objective Elliott analysts are stating that November 2008 was NOT the bottom and that there is a final 5th wave to take us lower... just we're all not sure from where or when the 5th wave will strike us.
  • Chuck,

    Being relatively new to applying Elliott in real time and not just from past examples, it's fascinating to see textbook patterns play out right before my eyes here and have an extra layer of analysis potential to overlay what I'm seeing through my standard interpretation. I'm not yet ready to turn it all over to Elliott, but I think it's useful at a minimum to set targets, figure out possible price projections, assess a possible price structure, and manage risk through basic rules (there really are only 3 solid rules - the rest is up for interpretation).

    But it's that interpretation that allows so much flexibility. Each Elliott analyst is encouraged to maintain a Preferred count and then one or perhaps two (or more) Alternate counts. It's perhaps good that prominent Elliotticians are debating exactly what the preferred count should be.

    Regarding the economy, things are bad and getting worse, but fortunately for us traders, the market will bottom months in advance of the actual economic bottom, so we need to be aware of this and not simply look around and think "Well, the economy is horrible, so I'll get short." Technicals (price) tend to lead fundamentals by three or more months which is endlessly confusing to newer traders.

    It's truly fascinating to be living and trading through this environment!
  • Andrew,

    There are other Elliott analysts who believe that the fractal iv of minor 3 of large scale 3 is not over yet - I didn't air that view publicly because I suspect it's a minority view and one that truly has devastating consequences for the market as a whole were that to wind up being the count. I feel so guilty stating such bearish price projections but I'm trying to interpret Elliott as best I can and open the floor to others' projections as well.

    I'll try to do some Fib projections in TradeStation and make them public like I did for the Fibonacci retracement confluence grid - that's a great idea for a post.
  • Victor,

    I actually think the second interpretation would do the most damage. Under that interpretation, we'll be breaking the November lows before long and then do a decent rally up into the circled 4 wave before crashing much lower in the final circled 5.

    Under the first count, the circled 4 terminates at a higher level than the second interpretation, and then the bad circled 5th wave ends at a higher location as a result.

    Under the second interpretation, the 4 doesn't go as high and then the circled 5 could take us to SP index level 450 to 500.

    However, I do agree and have been discussing my 'disgust' with people on TV screaming we're at a bottom, encouraging the public to begin buying here - and all evidence is that many of them are. I truly believe we'll put in the actual bottom when people never want to hear the word "stock market" again. We're clearly not there yet but a move to S&P; value 600 might just do that.
  • Anon,

    Actually, I didn't know how to get more white space in StockCharts so I had to terminate my 5th Wave drawing in both charts at the same location. Under the first interpretation, I view us going down as far as 600 but on the second interpretation, I wouldn't be surprised to see 450 or - gasp - 400 or less which would be utterly devastating. There are some market prognosticators calling for such a level, though I'm not entirely sure their logic.

    I'd love it if we played out the first scenario, but I just don't feel like the fractal 3 and 4 are in proportion to the fractal 1 and 2. It's so puzzling.
  • Toad,

    That's sort of what I was thinking. In the 2nd chart, I'd purposely drawn the green arrow going up and that was much earlier in the day. The Fed action and 5% move in the S&P; clearly confirm that view.

    Exactly which interpretation it confirms... that's more murky. But we still have some upside to go before the next move down hits I feel.
  • Bond Trader,

    I'll try to do an Elliott count as best I can on various bond and yield charts, but it may be this weekend as I'd like a close (on Friday) to start delving down on the weekly structure. Please remind me if I haven't gotten the count out on the blog by Sunday.
  • Wow! You all didn't let me down! I'll start with the earlier comments and work my way down.
  • Vasu
    Guys !!!
    My understanding is that always it is the financials which are leading the market either UP or DOWN. My elliot wave analysis on XLF shows that it has completed the Big wave 3 down and started it's wave 4 correction. Hence I believe that corey's 1 st analysis fits in very well with this. Excellent explanation 0nce again corey !! keep up the good job.
  • Anonymous
    NotAfraid, DJI 9500 or SP 1000 is my target of this wave 4.
  • NotAfraidofTrend
    As you could have made out by now, I am shorted too soon, and am losing my shirt but, fortunately, I am not leveraged, so I can hang in there. Just need your support!
  • NotAfraidofTrend
    Given the ferocity of the downtrend, will anyone give this wave 4 more than 38.2% retracement? That makes the target of wave 4 to be 921. In fact, in the entire downtrend so far, the retracements have lacked conviction. Moreover, the economy, the market fundamentals, and desperation of the market "saviors" is in line with this argument.
  • NotAfraidofTrend
    The debate rages on! But, whether it is option #1 or #2, one thing is for sure. The market will come down again, at least one more time, to retest 750. The only question is how much more is it going to go up before turning around? In other words, are there many people who are sure, like Larry Kudlow, that the bottom for the bear market has already been put in? If not sure, it could not be a good time to go long. Instead, completion of wave 4, whether fractal of big wave 3 or big wave 4 itself, is a good time to go short.
  • Chuck
    Absolutely great post Corey! I'm with you, although wave 3 was devastating, something is just quite not right with it's fractal 4 and 5 (they're too tight). Also, the US economy is in a really bad shape (fundamentally). Let's see how things evolve... While EW analysis is a powerful tool, it's inconsistencies like this that make it less useful. But without doubt, we'll soon find out what's the proper count. Thanks again for pointing this out loud, I love your blog!
  • Andrew Stanton
    The second waves are all sharp so expect the fours at whatever level to be complex and wave iv might not even be over yet. Perhaps some Fibonacci extensions of circled wave 1 might help.
  • Victor Berry
    I believe Elliott Wave Option #1 more closely matches up with Charles Nenner's cyclical analysis (i.e., final peak in the April-May timeframe). Plus, Option #1 would do the most psychological and financial damage to the ordinary American who still thinks buy-and-hold is a viable stock market investment strategy.
  • Anonymous
    Corey, excellent post! Actually, I prefer your first argument. 1) The form of wave structure is more important than anything else including timing. The structure of the first count is good. 2) Wave 5 and wave 1 tend to have equal length. If you calculate the length of wave 5 of wave 3 (circled) and the length of wave 1 of wave 3 (circled), they are about the same. Thank you for your diligent work.
  • toad37
    After today we perhaps have a little more clarity that we are in wave 4 up, all IMO.
  • bond trader
    boinds are screaming higher post fed, and i would love some elliot guidance on the bond here, on weeklies or dailies,..
  • Dave,

    There's a couple of scenarios I see playing out. If NotAfraid is right, then we're almost done and a lot of people seem to be calling this an Elliott triangle so if that's the case, then it's possible we've already seen the high.

    A rudimentary target would be roughly 1,000 or so.

    The 50% classical Fib retracement of the entire spike to spike move of the fractal wave 3 is 1,026, which currently corresponds with the falling 20 week EMA so I see that as sort of a lid that will hold price down should we reach that level.

    Otherwise, the 38.2% retracement of the whole move is at 921 which is just overhead. I would target somewhere in the vicinity of 920 to 1,020 - I know that's a big range. But if the triangle structure is correct, again, we may have already seen the highs and will be headed down in fractal 5 soon.
  • Toad,

    It's one of my big flaws as a blogger but I tend not to follow other blogs or newsletters just out of time constraint. I'm unaware of him but will check out what his service is like.
  • Dave
    Corey,
    I really appreciate your analysis. Assuming the 2nd wave count is correct, what is your upside target for the end of 4(of3)?

    Thanks in advance and keep up the great work!
  • toad37
    Excellent post Corey! Do you happen to follow Dr. McHugh's newsletter?
  • NotAfraid,

    Thank you for reading and commenting!

    It's taken me a while to accept that scenario, particularly for what it means going forward in the market, but that is now the direction in which I am leaning, barring any massive rally to the upside... and will be confirmed particularly should we take out the 750 lows soon.

    I suspect we're probably halfway or slightly more finished with the fractal 4th of the 3rd, and it really does look like some sort of triangle on the lower timeframes which could be in the C or D wave currently.

    Heaven help the bulls if this count winds up to be correct.
  • NotAfraidofTrend
    Thanks, Corey, for your wonderful blog site. It is obvious that you put your heart and soul into helping others. Thanks again!

    I agree with you that, most probably, the second scenario fits the Elliott theory a lot better. Time is a very important feature of the waves. So, we are more likely in fractal 4 of the big wave 3. Furthermore, IMHO, it appears that fractal 4 is also almost over. We should know this week.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Top Traders Reveal Their Methods in Detailed Interviews